The regional leaders who set Hampton Roads' road building priorities are going to sit down with local lawmakers next week to talk about the potential for expanding the Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel.
In the complex sausage-making of upgrading Hampton Roads' strained transportation network this breaks down to a simple equation. The folks who set the region's priorities are sitting down with the people who hold the state's checkbook. Both sides are getting together in Chesapeake next Wednesday.
Transportation has been a top issue for state lawmakers for years, but despite the intense focus and lofty rhetoric the General Assembly has gotten very little accomplished in gridlocked Hampton Roads and Northern Virginia - where traffic problems are a constant plague.
One of the major problems hamstringing the debate is the fact that leaders are fractured on a wide range of issues making the complex problem murky and difficult to digest. No one can agree on what to build, where to build it, and in what order or what combination of taxes and tolls should be used to pay for the problems.
Perhaps the most volatile and geographical disagreement centers on the Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel - the arch-nemesis of Peninsula drivers and politicians. For folks on the Peninsula the HRBT is the be all and end all of major traffic problems. Interstate-64 narrowing to two-lanes each way south of Williamsburg is a solid second place - but if you ask about traffic around here the HRBT gets top billing.
That's what makes it so hard for many locals to understand why regional planners at the Hampton Roads Planning District Commission set up a priority list of projects that doesn't include any upgrades at the HRBT.
The argument is that projects like the third crossing and upgrading the Midtown and Downtown tunnels and widening U.S. Route 460 - help make Hampton Roads transportation network function properly as a whole system. Sure the jams are long at the HRBT, but any upgrades built there would cut deeply into neighborhoods in Norfolk and the extra lanes would probably be gobbled up in short order anyway.
Meanwhile, efforts to fund the existing priority list in Richmond have consistently fallen flat. Peninsula lawmakers insist that any solution must include the HRBT - that list includes among others Del. Phil Hamilton, Del. G. Glenn Oder, Del. Tom Gear and Sen. John Miller.
It was a letter from Oder and Hamilton that pushed the Virginia Department of Transportation to pay for a high-level study of what could be done at the HRBT. The study lists a variety of options at the crossing and was presented on both sides of the water in December by state Transportation Secretary Pierce Homer.
On the Peninsula - residents were encouraged to see the HRBT back on the table. In Norfolk, citizens were furious that the plan could carve up Willoughby Spit and Commodore Park. Norfolk Mayor Paul Fraim submarined the study when he said that the city's leaders would work against a wider HRBT.
Now the table is set with Fraim and other regional planners like Newport News Mayor Joe Frank ready to hear how the crossing could be upgraded. In the same room, state lawmakers are probably going to try to make the case that the HRBT is the center of our traffic hourglass.
Add in the fact that there is plenty of bad-blood between these two groups stemming from the creation of the financially gutted Hampton Roads Transportation Authority and there's bound to be plenty of tension.
This is not a new debate, so don't expect folks to be won over by arguments they have been having since the 1990s. But the back-and-forth between lawmakers and mayors around the same table is unique and could be a significant window into the potential for upgrading the region's road network.
Then again it could just turn out to be a day full of passive aggressive posturing.



Recent Comments